Appleton Common Council Meeting for March 17
Little Italy Branch Library, Chicago (Skidmore, Owings & Merrill)
Good afternoon District 6,
I normally send updates after the Common Council meeting, but I wanted to make sure that everyone is aware of a couple of items of interest in tomorrow’s council meeting.
As expected, the Finance Committee recommended approval of
awarding the contract for design and engineering services for the library
building to Skidmore, Owings & Merrill in the amount of $2,721,389 with a
5% contingency of $136,070 for a project total not to exceed $2,857,459. Close
budget-watchers might remember that the 2021 budget included $2,400,000 for the
design. The following explanation is from Director Gazza:
“The 2021 Budget includes $2,400,000 for library design
services. It was anticipated design would begin in 2021 and construction would
begin in 2022. This contract also includes construction administration services
to be completed in 2022. Rather than creating two separate contracts, it is
standard practice to issue one contract to include all services. In order to
provide the additional spending authority for the anticipated cost of this
contract, a 2021 Budget amendment is also being proposed for $457,459, which
will be deducted from the existing project total of $26.4 million as approved
in the 2021 Budget and Service Plan. It is anticipated that any budgeted funds
related to this contract that are not expended in 2021 would be carried over to
2022.”
The contract is on the full council agenda for tomorrow,
March 17. If you have input on the issue, you can send to me before tomorrow afternoon,
or you can speak at the meeting either in person (masks and social distancing
are required in council chambers) or virtually by calling the City Clerk’s
office before 3:00 p.m. today to register at (920) 832-6443. When you register,
you will be given the Zoom link to participate.
Another issue that will appear on the agenda is alderperson
salaries. Alderpersons do not vote on their current salaries, and state law
prohibits us doing so after taking out paperwork to run for re-election. The
item was not sent by staff to the Human Resources and Information Technology
Committee in time to act for the full council who will be elected in April of
2022. We could have voted to raise the salaries of only those alderpersons who
will not be running until 2022, or we could propose the salary for 2023. All on
the committee agreed that two different salaries did not make sense, so we
wanted to send something to the full council. There was some discussion and a
couple of motions that were withdrawn, and Alderperson Martin eventually made a
motion to base the salaries on what the City of Green Bay pays their council members,
which I understood to be some sort of figure pro-rated by population and number
of council members. I was doing some quick calculations and figured that this
would work out to a small raise. Eventually, Alderperson Martin moved to set
the salary at $10,125, which I think surprised all of us. I voted against this
motion, as did Alderperson Firkus, but the rest of the committee voted to
approve, really to get it to the full council, where it will certainly be
amended to either no increase or a small increase – the last increase was 1.5%.
While no one serves on the Common Council for the money – the
pay starting in April is $6221 per year, or a net of a bit over $100 per week, it
does take quite a bit more time than just the council meeting every two weeks.
We all serve on two or more committees which also generally meet twice a month,
and we need to answer calls and emails from our constituents, plus research
issues that are before us in order to make informed decisions. I worry that our
community and others are taking the ability to serve away from those who are
not able to devote the time required because they need to be working more hours
at their primary job, or because they need to pay for childcare for meetings. I
work hard at being an alderperson, but my life experiences don’t necessarily
give me the same perspective as a young working parent or a single person working
multiple jobs just to get by.
All that being said, I just don’t think it is the right time
to spend $90,000 more in alderperson salaries. I will join my colleagues to
amend the resolution as noted above – for a small increase in 2023 since the
last increase was for 2021 and there will be no increase for 2022.
Comments
Post a Comment