Good morning District 6,
It has been nice to speak with some of you in person recently
– balancing the ongoing work of the council with a re-election campaign has
made for some very busy days. I am grateful that we are going to have warm
weather for a while.
I wanted to send a quick update before the Common Council
meeting Wednesday to highlight a couple of agenda items that have raised some
questions.
The first is Resolution #3-R-22 regarding Municipal Code
Chapter 12, Article III, Weeds and Wild Growth – otherwise known as “No Mow May”.
What this resolution seeks is to make No Mow May city policy each year, NOT to
eliminate the ordinance that requires that lawn vegetation be lower than a
specific height. After June 1, the ordinance will apply as usual. The “Noxious
Weed” ordinance adopted from the state statute applies regardless of No Mow May.
I believe that this addresses some of the concerns that have been expressed
about the city not being able to act on abandoned or neglected property that is
clearly not participating in No Mow May. Properties such as these are likely to
be infested with noxious weeds as well as tall grass. In the Municipal Services
Committee, the resolution was amended by replacement with language that would require
No Mow May to be adopted each year. In my opinion, this requires that we spend
a lot the time of council members and city staff discussing it each year when
we could make the policy effective every year by modifying the ordinance. I am
NOT in favor of changing the maximum height to 12 inches on residential
property to match the rule for undeveloped property and would move to amend or
vote for this amendment. When the item came to committee, I asked city staff
for the weed complaint numbers for the last few years. We had No Mow May in 2020
and 2021:
Number
of customer service cases for high grass and weeds:
2021- 287
2020- 232
2019- 275
2018- 261
The complaints were actually quite a bit lower in 2020 and
not significantly higher last year.
As I have written before, there was a scientific
peer-reviewed study showing the positive effects of No Mow May on both the variety
and number of bee species. Last year, the rusty patched bumblebee, which has
been listed as an endangered species, was spotted in Appleton – the first
sighting in Northeast Wisconsin. Some have questioned the study done by
Professor Del Toro of Lawrence University, but I will note that he was recently
awarded a substantial grant by the National Science Foundation to enhance his
work on bee conservation.
The Pollenablers group has supported No Mow May is the past by providing signage with links to
educational material about saving pollinators and has worked with participants
to arrange pick up of grass clippings for composting. They plan to continue
support, including ideas for a raffle to raise money for more signage, with prizes
including lawn mowing service at the end of May.
The other resolution that is getting a lot of attention is Resolution
#4-R-22, titled Clean Water & Treaty Rights. This resolution is quite lengthy
– linked below. Essentially the resolution calls for the Common Council to ask
the Department of Natural Resources to reject the Enbridge Line 5 permit.
http://cityofappleton.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?M=F&ID=8251d487-caf3-4ac7-938f-f24102784328.pdf
I believe everyone knows my stance on environmental issues –
I was a member of the Taskforce on Sustainability, Climate Mitigation and
Adaptation for its full term, and I am an enthusiastic supporter of Appleton’s
ongoing sustainability efforts. The key for me here is APPLETON. These projects
are many miles from Appleton, and I do not see them as being under the purview
of the Appleton Common Council. I have supported “advocacy resolutions” in the
past, such as the resolution condemning the harassment of members of the Asian
American community during the COVID-19 pandemic, but in those cases, citizens
of Appleton were directly affected. I will not be supporting this resolution
and have approached the authors about withdrawing it.
On a more positive note about sustainability, the Finance
Committee recommended approval of a plan for the City of Appleton to
participate in the “Solar Now” project with WE Energies. The program pays for
the entire cost of engineering and installation of a solar array. In addition,
the city would receive monthly payments and have no responsibility for
maintenance of the system, essentially removing risk if the system does not
perform to design. The typical lease is 20 years. The facilities included would
be the Municipal Services Building, Valley Transit’s building project and the
new library. Because the panels are already installed on the Municipal Services
Building, WE Energies will be reimbursing the city for the full cost of that
project. We will be receiving a lease payment that is approximately 50% of the
renewable energy cost.
Full details are here: http://cityofappleton.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?M=F&ID=84cac835-9281-481f-b1d6-5998fc66308b.pdf
As always, you can view meeting videos and see full meeting
agendas and minutes here:
https://cityofappleton.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx
Comments
Post a Comment